Hi Jose!
Jose E. Marchesi writes:
> Is there a list of already written modules/applications written on it?
Yes, the blog is written in Artanis, you may check it out:
https://gitlab.com/NalaGinrut/colt/
I haven't released it officially, but I didn't find bug for 1 month
online test for my own b
"Thompson, David" writes:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:40 AM Matt Wette wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/19 9:39 PM, Christopher Howard wrote:
>> > Hi, it seems like with the flexibility of Guile, I should be able to do
>> > something like this:
>> > ```(define (foo) (let ((a 1)(b 2)(c 3))
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:29:35AM +, Todor Kondić wrote:
> You know, there is a big IT department within our institution and telling
> them I will base some serious work on technologies such as GNU Guile and
> Guix did raise a few eyebrows (those not raised are probably the cause of
> thei
>
> Define dump-into-debugging-repl as
>
> (start-repl #:debug (make-debug (stack->vector (make-stack #t)) 0
> "trap!" #t))
>
> But as for getting access to locals I don't know if there is a
> solution. I have worked on removing slot sharing in the CPS
> processing
> but it's not working an
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:40 AM Matt Wette wrote:
>
> On 10/17/19 9:39 PM, Christopher Howard wrote:
> > Hi, it seems like with the flexibility of Guile, I should be able to do
> > something like this:
> > ```(define (foo) (let ((a 1)(b 2)(c 3))(jump-into-
> > debugging-repl))
On 10/17/19 9:39 PM, Christopher Howard wrote:
Hi, it seems like with the flexibility of Guile, I should be able to do
something like this:
```(define (foo) (let ((a 1)(b 2)(c 3))(jump-into-
debugging-repl)))```
And have access to a, b, and c and their values. But I'm not qui
Dear Andy,
As a subscriber to the guile-user list only, I got wind of this discussion
indirectly. If you already want a thorough discussion about future from the
community members, perhaps including its less technical members (users) would
not be such a bad idea (ie guile-user list, too). Consi
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:51:52AM +0200, zx spectrumgomas wrote:
> Yes, it clarifies things. I don't agree with you, but you have a noble
> heart. I hope you all come to an agreement.Thanks.
Thanks :)
and... agreed. I've been mostly a bystander here, but have
perceived most of you (Andy, Mark, M
Yes, it clarifies things. I don't agree with you, but you have a noble
heart. I hope you all come to an agreement.Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
> zx spectrumgomas writes:
>
> > Of your words: “RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer.” , the
> > word “yet”
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver writes:
> zx spectrumgomas writes:
>
>> Of your words: “RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer.” , the
>> word “yet” I guess that means if he would have had his permission then you
>> wouldn't have needed it of the current maintainers, as I also deduce from
>> he
zx spectrumgomas writes:
> Of your words: “RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer.” , the
> word “yet” I guess that means if he would have had his permission then you
> wouldn't have needed it of the current maintainers, as I also deduce from
> here:
> “Frankly, it should not be your dec
Hi guys,
I am new to all of this and I can tell you, I love guile and the guile
documentation. It is such a nice system. Incredible. Thanks for building
and maintaining guile. I enjoy it immensely.
Cheers
Uli
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:17AM +0200, zx spectrumgomas wrote:
[...]
You are not being helpful. Please, stop this.
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Of your words: “RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer.” , the
word “yet” I guess that means if he would have had his permission then you
wouldn't have needed it of the current maintainers, as I also deduce from
here:
“Frankly, it should not be your decision to make.”
https://lists.gnu.org
zx spectrumgomas writes:
> It's milk
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2019-10/msg00031.html
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what this means. If you are accusing
me of something, can you state your case clearly, without reference to
proverbs?
Mark
15 matches
Mail list logo
