Dear simon,
Thank you for writing!
The error-reporting in wisp is currently not at the level of regular
Scheme. For some errors you already get the line numbers, but others
still lack them.
The happy case: If you run the following via guile --language=wisp
/tmp/test.w, for example, you get the c
[I'm CC'ing guile-user because what I'm about to say might be more
relevant there...]
Vladimir Sedach writes:
> I use json-reformat.el in Emacs, and the jq program (which does
> pretty-printing, among many other things) when I have to shell
> script.
>
Isn't both programs work with json instead
Dear,
As you maybe know, the Guix Workflow Language [1] now support the Wisp
notation [2].
And it improves the readibility, IMHO.
Nice!
[1] https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/guixworkflowmanagement/
[2] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gwl.git/tree/gwl/utils.scm#n34
However, Wisp
