Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>
>> As announced at FOSDEM,[1] I now released Wisp 1.0:
>>
>>https://www.draketo.de/english/wisp#v1.0
>>
>> At this point wisp the language is complete. And from what Ricardo said
>> at FOSDEM, I think it achieves its goal:
>>
>>
zx spectrumgomas writes:
> I'm sorry if it's a stupid question, but can the opposite process be done?
> I mean, is there lisp2wisp?
That is no stupid question at all.
The opposite process is possible — the readable project has a sweeten[1]
script which does just that for readable syntax — but
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> As announced at FOSDEM,[1] I now released Wisp 1.0:
>
>https://www.draketo.de/english/wisp#v1.0
>
> At this point wisp the language is complete. And from what Ricardo said
> at FOSDEM, I think it achieves its goal:
>
> “Wisp allows people to see code how Lis
I'm sorry if it's a stupid question, but can the opposite process be done?
I mean, is there lisp2wisp?
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 8:43 PM Arne Babenhauserheide
wrote:
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> > Congrats! :)
>
> Thank you :-)
>
> Here’s the partial downloadmesh implementation in Schem
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Congrats! :)
Thank you :-)
Here’s the partial downloadmesh implementation in Scheme I still wanted
to send you, by the way:
https://bitbucket.org/ArneBab/wisp/src/cca15c7abc86a500a313315344f9f46bc90e9ce8/examples/downloadmesh.w
(still need to convert it wit
I found the mistake. I only had to add two lines. It works.
(use-modules (gl) (glut))
(use-modules (gl contrib packed-struct))
(define-packed-struct vertices
(x float)
(y float)
(z float)
(r float)
(g float)
(b float))
(define vertices-square (make-packed-array vertices 4))
(pack ver
Congrats! :)
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
> As announced at FOSDEM,[1] I now released Wisp 1.0:
>
>https://www.draketo.de/english/wisp#v1.0
>
> At this point wisp the language is complete. And from what Ricardo said
> at FOSDEM, I think it achieves its goal:
>
> “Wisp allows peop
