Re: Long command line arguments using SRFI 37

2019-01-06 Thread Zelphir Kaltstahl
On 1/6/19 1:07 PM, tantalum wrote: > i dont know if it is possible, but the source code of srfi-37 is > available, on my machine it is at > /usr/share/guile/2.2/srfi/srfi-37.scm. i didnt see an option for the > "--name value" case at first glance. > > apparently the --name=value syntax is to allow

Re: unit tests best practice

2019-01-06 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hi Cato and Mike, Thanks for the discussion — this is already shedding a ton of light :-) Catonano writes: > Il giorno gio 3 gen 2019 alle ore 19:45 Mike Gran ha > scritto: > >> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:53:33PM +0100, Catonano wrote: >> > Wat's the best practice to instrument a Guile based pr

Re: unit tests best practice

2019-01-06 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 18:12, Catonano a écrit : > > > Il giorno sab 5 gen 2019 alle ore 17:49 Amirouche Boubekki < > amirouche.boube...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Insightful post for those interested in autotool-fu. >> >> By the way, I have a demo repo with how to setup coverage, if you are >>

Re: Long command line arguments using SRFI 37

2019-01-06 Thread tantalum
i dont know if it is possible, but the source code of srfi-37 is available, on my machine it is at /usr/share/guile/2.2/srfi/srfi-37.scm. i didnt see an option for the "--name value" case at first glance. apparently the --name=value syntax is to allow for long options with optional values. othe