On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Kovacsics Róbert wrote:
Hello!
I have trouble with getting GOOPS and modules to co-operate. What I am
trying to do is to have 'A subclass B' where A is something akin to an
abstract class, that is it has generic "x" for which it provides no
implementation. This is my minimu
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your reply -- I think I have solved it (although I took a
> slightly different approach*) -- the problem was probably that the scale
> was too small for anything to be visible, and it was sufficient to enlarge
>
Hello!
I have trouble with getting GOOPS and modules to co-operate. What I am
trying to do is to have 'A subclass B' where A is something akin to an
abstract class, that is it has generic "x" for which it provides no
implementation. This is my minimum broken example:
; =
(define-module (mbe a)
New features:
- Hygienic and lexically scoped macro system (syntax-rules)
- New keyword force-pure-expr
- New procedure peek-character
Homepage:
http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/
SourceForge page:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/theme-d/
- Tommi Höynälänmaa
New features:
- Compiled for Theme-D version 0.9.4.
Homepage:
http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/theme-d-gnome.html
SourceForge page:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/theme-d-gnome/
- Tommi Höynälänmaa