Pierre Lairez :
> No, forget what I just wrote, this is obvious.
Two mathematicians met in the university cafeteria. They exchanged
hellos and started chatting. It turned out one of them had just prepared
a paper and was about to send it out for peer review. He had a draft
copy with him and the f
No, forget what I just wrote, this is obvious.
Pierre
On 02/07/2016 04:39, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pierre Lairez writes:
>
>> I understand why we cannot use (eof-object) in a “case” statement. For
>> example, this will not run as it is meant:
>> (case (get-char port)
>> (((eof-object
Hello Mark,
Thanks for your answer, and I see your point concerning the
non-readability of EOF.
And by the way, this point is not so obvious, contrary to what the doc says:
>
> Macro: /SCM/ *SCM_EOF_VAL*
>
> The Scheme end-of-file value. It has no standard written
> representation, for ob
