Héllo,
I foward to you (guile-user) this message that might be of interest,
Original Message
Subject: A (Graph?) database for GNU
Date: 2014-01-01 15:38
From: amz3
To: gnu-misc-disc...@gnu.org
Héllo all,
First, I know that it's not welcomed to ask people to write free
s
> (define (f) (define (g) (define (h) ((lambda x (cdr x (h)) (g))
> (f)
:13:0: In procedure #:13:0 x>:
:13:0: In procedure cdr: Wrong type argument in position
1 (expecting pair): ()
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue
> ,bt
In current input:
13:0 0 (#
It turned out, that the above solution doesn't work
exactly as expected -- since the scopes of "private"
and "interface" get separated (by the with-syntax
form that I have been so proud of), it is impossible
for the public forms to refer to private bindings.
To solve that issue, I had to pass the
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:30:32 +0100
Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
> After reading some of the original paper by Dybvig[1],
> I finally managed to get the macro right. The trick
> was to use "with-syntax", which -- I have to admit
> -- is still a little magical to me. But by mimicking
> the way the proc
After reading some of the original paper by Dybvig[1],
I finally managed to get the macro right. The trick
was to use "with-syntax", which -- I have to admit
-- is still a little magical to me. But by mimicking
the way the procedure "generate-temporaries" has
been used in the Dybvig's implementatio
