Are `display' and `write' supposed to get overwritten with generic
functions when GOOPS is loaded? The manual says so, but when I try it in
2.0.9 and the latest build on master, it doesn't seem to happen:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
scheme@(guile-user)> display
$2 = #
scheme@(g
On 11/28/2013 08:24 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
Sounds like this series might be useful for you too then, as
it generalizes dynamic varobjs, decoupling them from python:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-11/msg00739.html
Yeah, patch #1 ~ #4 are about the generalization.
--
Yao (齐尧)
On 11/25/2013 03:09 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>
> I didn't handle varobj because it's got Python more tightly embedded
> in it, and I think adding it can wait until there's an actual need.
Sounds like this series might be useful for you too then, as
it generalizes dynamic varobjs, decoupling them fro
