> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:35:33 +0100
> From: Panicz Maciej Godek
>
> ;;; compiling .\extra\common.scm
> ;;; compiling c:/guile2/share/guile/2.0\system\vm\frame.scm
> Backtrace:
> In unknown file:
>?: 1 ;;; compiling system\vm\frame.scm
> Exception thrown while printing backtrace:
> ERROR: I
Hi,
perhaps you'd be able to provide me with a quick hint.
I've finally managed to compile my framework SLAYER
to run on Windows. I used the latest snapshot,
guile-2.0.9.98-36c40-dirty, and compiled it without threads
(I had to pass "ac_cv_func__set_invalid_parameter_handler=no"
to configure, becau
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
>> usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at the Scheme level.
>
> Yeah.
> That'll require gdb maintaining its own table(s) for each kind of smob
> we want to int
() Doug Evans
() Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:40:18 -0800
Would it be ok to punt on eq?-ness until there's a compelling reason
to make it work?
Does the non-‘eq?’-ness of smobs prevent them from retaining object
properties, here? This is the long-standing bug that GNU Serveez is
addressing (in the
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
>> fyi, I've uploaded my gdb-guile branch to github.
>>
>> https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
>>
>> It's in branch gdb-guile.
>
> Nice piece of work from several angles (implementation strategy, test
> coverag
