Nala Ginrut wrote:
>I think the most efficient way is to use 'cpp' of gcc to do the
>pre-processer, or you have to try eval-when, please read the manual for
OK, I did read up on it, but it's not a parent how to go about this
interpreter testing.
I don't want to get a preprocessor into it, beca
I think the most efficient way is to use 'cpp' of gcc to do the
pre-processer, or you have to try eval-when, please read the manual for it.
在 2013-7-29 PM7:23，"白い熊" 写道：
> Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
> >> I would like to program for Guile as the lowest denominator.
> >>
> >> What is the proper check I sh
Nala Ginrut wrote:
>> I would like to program for Guile as the lowest denominator.
>>
>> What is the proper check I should define that would tell me whether
>I'm currently interpreting the code in Guile, or Emacs, or Crisp.
>>
>
>If you just want to check whether a symbol was defined, try:
>(mo
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:21 +0200, 白い熊 wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm developping a program which I'd like to be able to use without
> modification with Guile as the interpreter as well as Emacs lisp and clisp.
>
Hi! Welcome to Guile!
> So far, I was only programming for Emacs/Clisp, for this I us
Hello:
I'm developping a program which I'd like to be able to use without modification
with Guile as the interpreter as well as Emacs lisp and clisp.
So far, I was only programming for Emacs/Clisp, for this I used a rather crude
check of:
(defun kx-emacsp ()
(not (functionp #'function-l
