[ANN] guile-scsh 0.2

I here by announce the 0.2 version of guile-scsh, which is ported to guile-2.x and now available. you can get it from: https://gitorious.org/guile-scsh/guile-scsh Scsh, the scheme shell, a Unix Shell using scheme syntaxes, and much more powerful than bourne shell. Scsh is seized development for m

Re: Popularity (was Re: SLAYER announcement ...)

On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 12:42 -0700, Mike Gran wrote: > > From: Thien-Thi Nguyen > > > As Guile-SDL maintainer, i wonder what i can do to attract the same > > audience, whether or not it is worth expending the energy to do so, in > > what ways have i failed to encourage organic additive (as opposed

Re: Popularity (was Re: SLAYER announcement ...)

On Sun, 5 May 2013 12:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Mike Gran wrote: > (And speaking of libraries that will never be used... guile-ncurses > v1.4 dropped last week.  That'll never have any users because the > intersection in that Venn diagram is too small, consisting mostly of > me.  So, I write it for myself

Re: SLAYER announcement and help request for preparing a GNU package

2013/5/5 Thien-Thi Nguyen >I think that the simplicity could convince some people to employ >slayer to their multimedia projects -- because it requires no >additional setup and works out of the box, so for instance it could >be quite easily employed to implement the picture langua

Re: Popularity

Mike Gran wrote: > (And speaking of libraries that will never be used... guile-ncurses > v1.4 dropped last week.  That'll never have any users because the > intersection in that Venn diagram is too small, consisting mostly of > me.  So, I write it for myself.  Maybe I should follow my own > advice

Popularity (was Re: SLAYER announcement ...)

> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen > As Guile-SDL maintainer, i wonder what i can do to attract the same > audience, whether or not it is worth expending the energy to do so, in > what ways have i failed to encourage organic additive (as opposed to > parallel) hacking, and how wonderful/terrible it is for

Re: SLAYER announcement and help request for preparing a GNU package

() Panicz Maciej Godek () Sun, 5 May 2013 08:59:18 +0200 I think that the simplicity could convince some people to employ slayer to their multimedia projects -- because it requires no additional setup and works out of the box, so for instance it could be quite easily employed to imple

Re: Guile 100 Prob #4 TAR files

> - you make an extra 512 byte block if a file ends exactly on a block boundary (like a zero byte file, for example) I couldn't reproduce this, actually. Are you using the most recent copy of the code? My initial push had that issue, but I think I fixed it in this commit