Sorry, forgot to CC guile-user:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-04/msg00010.html
Not mentioned in NEWS is the addition of this blurb to README:
Note (Guile 2): Guile-SDL build, test and use is done strictly
w/ ‘GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0’ in the environment. If there are
build pr
Hey,
I've been trying to make some deeper inquiry. It turns out that the case is
not as simple as I thought.
I came up with the following function
(use-modules (oop goops) (ice-9 match) (srfi srfi-1))
(define (parent-methods method class)
(let* ((supers (class-direct-supers class))
(sup
2013/4/19 Tobias Brandt
> I posed the following question regarding constructors in Lisp/CLOS on
> stackoverflow:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16089809/whats-the-equivalent-of-constructors-in-clos
>
> The accepted answer uses the ability of CLOS to modifiy the arguments
> passed to CALL-
I posed the following question regarding constructors in Lisp/CLOS on
stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16089809/whats-the-equivalent-of-constructors-in-clos
The accepted answer uses the ability of CLOS to modifiy the arguments
passed to CALL-NEXT-METHOD.
I know it's (currently) n
