Re: use-modules: selecting, which symbols not to load

2012-12-27 Thread Mark H Weaver
Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > What I've been lacking is specifying symbols that are NOT meant > to be imported from a module. > So I'd wish to be able to load modules in the following manner: > > (use-modules ((rnrs) #:version (6) #:without (write display))) Although it is not documented, there'

Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0

2012-12-27 Thread Per Bothner
I don't think we ever resolved this. It would be great if we could get good support for Guile (and other Schemes). The way I like to work (and this is standard in every well-managed Free Software project) is I don't want to see your updated code; I want to see a patch (created using 'diff -u' or

Re: use-modules: selecting, which symbols not to load

2012-12-27 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2012/12/27 Thien-Thi Nguyen : > () Panicz Maciej Godek > () Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:43:16 +0100 > >I think it can sometimes be desirable to import the whole public >interface except certain bindings. > > Could you give a non-contrived example? I can't think of any, myself. > I remember toying

Re: use-modules: selecting, which symbols not to load

2012-12-27 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
() Panicz Maciej Godek () Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:43:16 +0100 I think it can sometimes be desirable to import the whole public interface except certain bindings. Could you give a non-contrived example? I can't think of any, myself. I remember toying w/ the idea when adding ‘#:renamer’, w/ sam