I've attached diff of 2007 testing.scm.
2012/4/21 Per Bothner
>
> I'm going to look at the patch in detail, but before I do, a question:
> Why is your srfi-64.scm.gz "for Guile, Chicken and Gambit" so very
> different from the reference implementation with your patch applied?
>
I just mean that
On 04/20/2012 03:19 AM, Sunjoong Lee wrote:
I'll attatch two files on this mail; srfi-64.scm.gz and testing.patch.gz.
The srfi-64.scm.gz file is for Guile, Chicken and Gambit users.
The testing.patch.gz file is for Per.
Much better. I applied your patch to the reference implementation,
and tha
Hi, Ludo’;
Your implementation fails srfi-64-test.scm, a test suite for the SRFI 64.
Per:
I realize the test-error of the reference implementation has a bug;
It calls %test-error like this - (test-assert (%test-error etype expr))
but %test-error needs three arguments - (%test-error r etype expr)
Hi,
Per Bothner skribis:
> I think it would be great to get SRFI-64 into Guile.
Me too.
FWIW, I’ve been using an almost-unmodified version in several projects:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libchop.git/tree/guile2/srfi
The only changes compared to the reference implementations are minor
Thanks Noah and Per;
English language is more difficult than scheme language for me. :(
I want to share my code or modification to others and learn somethings
during that.
Few days ago, I found testing.scm, the reference implementation of SRFI 64,
does not pass srfi-64-test.scm, a test suite for
release notes:
Bug fix plus "make check" improvements.
thi
README excerpt:
Guile-PG is a collection of modules for Guile allowing access to
the PostgreSQL RDBMS from Scheme programs.
The low-level module ‘(database postgres)’ provides an almost
one-to-one correspondence with the Po
release notes:
Guile-PG ventures out of the 7-bit ghetto!
(But venerates geezers PostgreSQL 7.4 and 8.0,
fending off punkish Guile \x indignities, pfui!)
Note that section 9.6 in the manual sez "[Guile] 2.0 doesn't have
this problem", but that is not yet fully confirmed. See the thread
