Alexei Matveev wrote:
> As a background, Fortran allows you to declare "foreign" functions, for
> example,
> like this:
>
> type, public, bind(c) :: scm_t
>private
>integer(c_intptr_t) :: do_not_ever_use
> end type scm_t
>
> interface
> function scm_symbol_p (obj) result (yes)
Hi Mark,
thanks again. I start to understand better the Guile 2 compile system. I
decided to dig into boot-9.scm to have a more precise idea of the ecosystem
around my scripts. Unfortunately it seems that the basic TeXmacs scripting
infrastructure need a major change to be run into Guile 2.0 an
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> Hey, here's a summer (to start with) of code idea:
>
> Rewrite GNU Screen in Guile Scheme.
> Bonus points for adding "vertical split" a la tmux.
>
Maybe I'm missing something, but doesn't screen *have* vertical split a la
tmux?
http://i.
Hello!
Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> Rewrite GNU Screen in Guile Scheme.
> Bonus points for adding "vertical split" a la tmux.
Good idea. :-)
I presume GNU Guile-NCurses could be of help here?
Extra bonus point: getting the Scheme implementation of screen actually
become the new GNU Screen (ma
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () Andrew Gwozdziewycz
> () Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:02:46 -0500
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but doesn't screen
> *have* vertical split a la tmux?
>
> http://i.imgur.com/IXdEF.png
>
> Certainly seems like it. Well then, we will nee
[resend to guile-user, first copy went to bug-guile]
Hi, All,
For use from a Fortran program I am collecting API fixes for libguile.so
as wrapper functions for what is provided to C-programs as macros.
I noted that some of the macros are function-macros some are symbol
macros. An example of the l
() Andrew Gwozdziewycz
() Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:57:48 -0500
Not to strike you down twice,
No worries, the mud's fine.
but I'm not sure how .screenrc's syntax would be better served
with s-expressions. To my knowledge it's completely line
oriented without any sort of section delimiting
Ian Price writes:
> The trick comes from, I think, Filinski's "Representing Monads",
> although it has been quite a while since I've read it. Instead of monads
> being represented by the usual 'bind' and 'unit' functions, or the
> (categorical?) definition of 'unit', 'fmap', 'join', they are inst
() Andrew Gwozdziewycz
() Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:02:46 -0500
Maybe I'm missing something, but doesn't screen
*have* vertical split a la tmux?
http://i.imgur.com/IXdEF.png
Certainly seems like it. Well then, we will need
something else bonus-points worthy, i suppose. The
only thing that s
Hey, here's a summer (to start with) of code idea:
Rewrite GNU Screen in Guile Scheme.
Bonus points for adding "vertical split" a la tmux.
(I got this idea after reading some screen vs tmux posts,
not ever having used tmux, personally, but somewhat irked
anyway by the "aging code base" vibe...)
10 matches
Mail list logo