Gubinelli Massimiliano writes:
> Thanks for the prompt reply to both of you. However the proposed
> solution do not work in my case.
I think it _did_ solve your original problem, but now you have moved on
to other unrelated problems.
> After implementing the
> begin-for-syntax alternative I now
Thanks for the prompt reply to both of you. However the proposed solution do
not work in my case. After implementing the begin-for-syntax alternative I now
get
scheme@(guile-user)> (load "main.scm")
;;; compiling /Users/mgubi/t/build-64-guile-2.0/test-modules/main.scm
;;; note: source file
/Use
Hi!
Mark gave great answers; I just wanted to give one more option:
On Tue 06 Mar 2012 22:48, Gubinelli Massimiliano writes:
> (load "test-modules.scm")
Add a definition first:
(cond-expand
(guile-2
(define-syntax-rule (begin-for-syntax form ...)
(eval-when (load compile eval)
Gubinelli Massimiliano writes:
> I stumbled on a strange behaviour of Guile 2.0, I have the following three
> files: main.scm, test-module.scm and sub/mymodule.scm which respectively
> contain
>
> main.scm
>
> (load "test-modules.scm")
>
> (inherit-modules (sub mymodule))
>
> (display (
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Excellent illustration, thank you!
>
> Ian Price skribis:
>
>> https://gist.github.com/1548531 - monadic reflection
>
> Could you expound on this one? I can feel the greatness, but I don’t
> fully grasp it. :-)
Yes, and it doesn't help that
