Paul,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:05:54PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 07:08 +0100, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> > Best is ‘string-every’ w/ ‘char-set:printing’ directly.
>
> I implemented this change. Seemed to work in both Guile 1.8 and 2.0.3.
Thanks for fixing this.
> Howev
Hey Guile hackers!
Anyone going to be at FOSDEM this weekend in Brussels? Ludovic and I
will be there, and we'd love to meet up. Unfortunately there were some
miscommunications this year and there is no GNU room, but oh well: we'll
just have to meet in a bar ;-)
Reply if you'll be there, and we
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 23:17 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> from Debian testing, and I don't see the problem for test from the
> make.info example - it works ok:
>
> define GUILEIO
> (define (mkclose)
> (close-port MKPORT)
> #f)
>
> #f
> endef
>
> Is
Hi Eli,
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:19:40 +0100
>>
>> > I finally traced that to the contents of guile-2.0.pc file:
>> >
>> > Libs: -L${libdir} -lguile-2.0 -Ld:/usr/lib -lgc
>> > Libs.private: d:/usr/lib/libgmp.dll.a -Ld:/us
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:19:40 +0100
>
> > I finally traced that to the contents of guile-2.0.pc file:
> >
> > Libs: -L${libdir} -lguile-2.0 -Ld:/usr/lib -lgc
> > Libs.private: d:/usr/lib/libgmp.dll.a -Ld:/usr/lib
> > d:/usr/lib/libltdl.dll.a -Ld:/
Hi Tobias,
On Mon 30 Jan 2012 20:17, Tobias Gerdin writes:
> 2012/1/23 Andy Wingo :
>> Did you ever run into problems with non-resumable continuations?
>
> At times I was scratching my head and wondering what was going on but
> if you mean continuations that wouldn't resume due to a bug I do not
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.5. This release fixes
> the binary interface information (SONAME) of libguile, which was
> incorrect in 2.0.4. It does not contain other changes.
>
> Please be sure to upgrade to 2.0.5 if you already instal
Tobias Gerdin writes:
> As long as you have some way to redirect the client back to the same
> application server things would scale quite well I think. You could
> embed some token identifying the application server in the URL which
> the reverse proxy could use to forward the request to the sam
