Re: The Web, Continuations, and All That

2012-01-30 Thread Tobias Gerdin
2012/1/23 Andy Wingo : > On Sun 22 Jan 2012 21:46, Ian Price writes: >> It's always nice to see someone playing with continuations. > > Yes, that was beautiful.  I'm happy you were able to get something > going, Tobias.  Did you ever run into problems with non-resumable > continuations? At times

Re: The Web, Continuations, and All That

2012-01-30 Thread Tobias Gerdin
2012/1/25 Ian Price : >>> It would be if someone(nudge nudge) were to take the effort to make one >>> of these experiments practical, since a guile web framework seems to be >>> a common request. >> >> While i like the idea i should note that it does not scale. What if you >> have 5 application se

Re: guile-2.0.pc misses a few dependency libraries

2012-01-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Eli Zaretskii skribis: >> >>> When statically linking programs against libguile-2.0.a, I get >>> unresolved externals. This is on MS-Windows, but I don't think this >>> is related to the problem. >>> >>> I finally traced

Re: guile-2.0.pc misses a few dependency libraries

2012-01-30 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Eli Zaretskii skribis: > >> When statically linking programs against libguile-2.0.a, I get >> unresolved externals. This is on MS-Windows, but I don't think this >> is related to the problem. >> >> I finally traced that to the contents of guile-2.0.pc fil

Re: guile-2.0.pc misses a few dependency libraries

2012-01-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Eli, Eli Zaretskii skribis: > When statically linking programs against libguile-2.0.a, I get > unresolved externals. This is on MS-Windows, but I don't think this > is related to the problem. > > I finally traced that to the contents of guile-2.0.pc file: > > Libs: -L${libdir} -lguile-2.0

Re: Errors using Guile 2.0 vs. Guile 1.8

2012-01-30 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sun 29 Jan 2012 23:57, Mark H Weaver writes: > Replying to myself... > >> The relevant difference is that in Guile 1.8, (define foo ...) returns >> #, but in Guile 2 it returns the 'variable' object for >> 'foo'. > > I actually think that this qualifies as a bug in Guile, so please don't > dep