OK, you were right :)
I made a small change -- instead of namiing my new class
, I simply named it , so that the smob name
overlaps with the class name. I don't know if it's a proper
programming style, but it's simple and it works.
There is, however, another problem that I've observed. I don't kno
I've been trying to add the superclass.
Adding it to and turned out
to be extremely simple, but the problem emerged
when I was trying to generalize the class.
The thing is that is implemented as a smob,
and that there is no easy way to add a superclass
to a class created from smob.
I can thin
-[ Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Andy Wingo ]
> > Actually 1.8 has a serious problem when it comes to multi-threading:
> > memoization, which modifies the source code tree structure, is not
> > thread-safe.
>
> Yeah, at this point I think that you really should be using 2.0 if you
> a
