"Andy Wingo" wrote:
> I added open-string-input-port and
> open-string-output-port, and at this point Marco's module
> passes its tests, though with many warnings about
> duplicated bindings.
Yes! Thanks to everyone. My infix to prefix transformer
works too,
Hello,
On Sat 19 Jun 2010 17:05, Cecil Westerhof writes:
> Op zaterdag 19 jun 2010 11:16 CEST schreef Andy Wingo:
>
>> ,profile (call-my-function)
>
> (main ("temp/input" "dummy.log" "^ +" "1234567890"))
Almost. At the repl, type:
(load "dummy.scm")
Then:
,profile (main '("dummy.scm" "
() Cecil Westerhof
() Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:05:50 +0200
(main ("temp/input" "dummy.log" "^ +" "1234567890"))
To answer this, you can try the following experiment:
$ cat > program <
Op zaterdag 19 jun 2010 11:16 CEST schreef Andy Wingo:
> On Fri 18 Jun 2010 22:50, Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
>> Why is this so expensive?
>
> The general answer to this question can be found by profiling. You
> should factor your code into a function, then from the repl:
>
> ,profile (call-my-fun
On Fri 18 Jun 2010 22:50, Cecil Westerhof writes:
> Why is this so expensive?
The general answer to this question can be found by profiling. You
should factor your code into a function, then from the repl:
,profile (call-my-function)
I wonder, perhaps we should have a --profile command-line
Hi Julian,
On Fri 18 Jun 2010 16:06, Julian Graham writes:
> Just pushed a fix for this -- `define-condition-type' was not
> producing condition accessor procedures that knew how to unpack
> compound conditions.
Cool, thanks!
> There's a new exception now, which looks related to our not having
