On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Tue 15 Jun 2010 23:41, No Itisnt writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> On Mon 14 Jun 2010 23:56, No Itisnt writes:
>>>
> There are some bugs still around regarding the compilation cache and
> r6rs modu
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 23:41, No Itisnt writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Mon 14 Jun 2010 23:56, No Itisnt writes:
>>
There are some bugs still around regarding the compilation cache and
r6rs modules -- or specifically, with versioned modules, which r6rs
>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Mon 14 Jun 2010 23:56, No Itisnt writes:
>
>>> There are some bugs still around regarding the compilation cache and
>>> r6rs modules -- or specifically, with versioned modules, which r6rs
>>> modules are. We're still working that one out and
Hi,
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 11:53, Tentaclius writes:
> (define-syntax test
> (syntax-rules ()
> ((test)
> (lambda args
> (match args
Guile's match implementation implemented using define-macro, so it is
not hygienic. `args' is produced by the expansion of a
Hi all,
I met this problem when having some experiments with define-syntax.
Just cannot understand what I do wrong.
(define-syntax test
(syntax-rules ()
((test)
(lambda args
(match args
('a (display "Test:a\n"))
('b (display "Test:b\n"))
On Mon 14 Jun 2010 23:56, No Itisnt writes:
>> There are some bugs still around regarding the compilation cache and
>> r6rs modules -- or specifically, with versioned modules, which r6rs
>> modules are. We're still working that one out and hpe to have something
>> in a couple days.
>
> Is that th
