Josef Wolf writes:
> BTW: While we're at the docs, what I find confusing about guile documentation
> is that it talks extensively about the C bindings, but has not much to say
> about the language itself and how guile differs from the standard (extensions,
> limitations). But maybe I've just not
Linas Vepstas writes:
> My pet peeve with mingw is the lack of ready-to-go regex. This is completely
> unrelated to guile; I have another project that made the mistake of assuming
> that regex "just worked" on windows, and I've been bitched at ever
> since.
Gnulib has a regex library.
> Getting
Peter Brett writes:
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> I've been making gradual progress on MinGW cross building, but I've
>> reached a point where I'm no longer sure that this is worthwhile. This
>> email explains why, and invites comments from anyone interested in this
>> - especially from anyone who
Ken Raeburn writes:
> Yes... you then also need to decide if Guile is exposing GNU/POSIX
> functionality, whatever the native OS functionality is, or some
> abstraction...
Ideally, yes, I think. In other words, I think it's preferable if Guile
provides the same function to applications on all p
Ken Raeburn writes:
> One nagging concern I've got about my Guile-Emacs project is the
> seemingly narrow focus of active Guile developers as far as platforms
> are concerned. I'm one of, what, two or three people testing the
> development versions on Mac OS X now and then, and most of the rest
Josef Wolf writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:15:57PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
>> defmacros are bound to bite you in the proverbial ass real hard when you
>> combine them with modules, so it's best to avoid them like the
>> plague. At least that's my experience, FWIW.
>
> Thanks for the w
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:36:16PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> On Mon 22 Mar 2010 20:50, Josef Wolf writes:
>
> >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=blob;f=doc/ref/api-macros.texi;h=51f54ed070af453a138282f61e7cd8dbbddc53a3;hb=HEAD
> >
> > Where can I find a version t
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 03:13:45PM +0100, szgyg wrote:
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> >I am trying to understand the defstruct macro from the "teach yourself
> >scheme in fixnum days" tutorial, which can be found in chapter 9 at
> >http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dorai/t-y-scheme/t-y-scheme-Z-H-11.html#node_cha
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:16:34PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> I seem to be the negative guy in replies to you.
Uh? I did not notice anything negative?
> Apologies for that!
I don't see any reason for you to apologize...
> On Mon 22 Mar 2010 20:25, Josef Wolf writes:
>
> > On Fr
Hi Josef,
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 20:50, Josef Wolf writes:
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=blob;f=doc/ref/api-macros.texi;h=51f54ed070af453a138282f61e7cd8dbbddc53a3;hb=HEAD
>
> Where can I find a version translated in pdf or html or something?
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/32939
On Wed 17 Mar 2010 21:09, David Pirotte writes:
> I know, guile-gnome-0 is obsolate ... But I have no choice right know and
> really really hope that
> I can help developers to find out what the problem is and debug it ...
As long as you know this :) This was released *five years ago* :)
Are
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:17:18 +0100
>> "Andy" == Andy Wingo wrote:
Andy> After some talk on IRC, I don't think gnucash folk are against
Andy> Guile 2.0, but they probably would appreciate help and patches
Andy> and so. I'll take a look at this later this week.
I did not mean to say they are '
Hi Josef,
I seem to be the negative guy in replies to you. Apologies for that!
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 20:25, Josef Wolf writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:54:02AM -0400, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>>
>> The result of (if #f #f) is unspecified, not #f, according to r5rs.
>> That means an implementation c
Hi!
On Sun 21 Mar 2010 16:53, Gour writes:
> Based on the info which I got, it looks that upcoming gnucash-2.4 will
> support only guile <= 1.8.x, so I'm curious if someone can share some
> info if adding support for 2.0 (which looks as significant milestone
> for guile) is easy or difficult tas
Hi!
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 02:28, Ken Raeburn writes:
> I think cross-compilation and cross-testing is a good thing to be able
> to do.
Totally agreed. I'd like to start compiling Guile for ARM devices now.
> Perhaps having build farms available with multiple platform types can
> help there.
Ther
On 22 March 2010 14:00, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi Peter (& Neil & co),
>
> On Mon 22 Mar 2010 09:10, Peter Brett writes:
>>
>> We get people coming to the gEDA user mailing list on a regular basis
>> saying, "Where can I find a version of gEDA for Windows?" and the
>> Windows builds we've put out ha
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:28:39PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri 19 Mar 2010 09:57, Josef Wolf writes:
>
> > (show-expansion (defstruct tree height girth age leaf-shape leaf-color))
>
> (macroexpand '(defstruct ...))
>
> You might want to surround that with (pretty-print ...) from
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:15:57PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> defmacros are bound to bite you in the proverbial ass real hard when you
> combine them with modules, so it's best to avoid them like the
> plague. At least that's my experience, FWIW.
Thanks for the warning. I'd like to understan
Hi Peter (& Neil & co),
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 09:10, Peter Brett writes:
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> I've been making gradual progress on MinGW cross building, but I've
>> reached a point where I'm no longer sure that this is worthwhile. This
>> email explains why, and invites comments from anyone
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:54:02AM -0400, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 04:57, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > My next question is more related to the defstruct macro.
> > In line 11, defstruct stores the default initializers into the vv vector:
> >
> > (if (pair? f) (cadr f) '(if #f #f)))
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
