2008/9/24 Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a bit of an open problem even if the other languages. You can
> specify a collective interface in Java (or a mixin class in C++), but
> you still cannot specify the required behavior of the protocol except
> in an ad hoc fashion. This is a pro
2008/9/25 David Séverin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> (or at least that's what the most people think. CLOS is rarely used
>> compared to C++ and Java -- can you explain why?)
>
> also because people in command sometimes have fear to take their
> responsability: here in Rio de Janeiro, 2 years ago, at PU
Le Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:04:51 +0200,
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> ...
> Note however that both these languages were invented to address
> the particular needs of OOP and as such are well suited for that purpose
> (or at least that's what the most people think. CLOS is rarely used
