"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is so wrong with forms like `(set! (vector-ref foo index) ...)'?
>
> In scheme the only problem is that they don't work, unless we
> redefine vector-ref:
> (define vector-get vector-ref)
> (define vector-ref (make-procedure-with-setter vector-get v
Clinton Ebadi:
>> I've been thinking of implementing this "location" stuff
>> as a smob, but you've got the point that it is (probably)
>> impossible to implement the location system without
>> redefining set! and define.
>
> You may want to read a few documents on functional programming to see
>
