I wrote:
>
> ... some words for the manual.
What else should be described?
Extra options to `readline' for the input/output ports, or is that
only meant for the %readline level and only set-readline-input-port!
for the high level?
(readline-port) create/return the readline port?
Is it possible
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> + (let ((outer-new-input-prompt new-input-prompt)
> + (outer-continuation-prompt continuation-prompt)
Could there be a way for an application to get the prompts back,
so it could do the same sort of save/restore too?
_
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Slightly confusingly, set-readline-prompt! does also set the default
> prompt for an explicit `readline' call (1). I think the overall
> situation would be clearer if it didn't.
It's not too terrible, may as well leave it alone in case anyone's
nutted i
