"Pat Lasswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Then, I have to edit the emitted config.h to remove
>
> #define socklen_t int
>
> because configure wrongly concludes it is absent from the system headers.
> It is also the cause of the warning during configure.
Thanks, I think we've got a fix for tha
"Pat Lasswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It seems that char 254 doesn't behave as expected in regular expressions on
> this platform.
Trying all bytes is probably bogus in a multibyte locale, but if we're
still in "C" locale at that point then it ought to work. (Maybe
should force (setlocal
First, during configure, this appearsconfigure: WARNING: libc.h: present but cannot be compiledconfigure: WARNING: libc.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?configure: WARNING: libc.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: libc.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"co
The goops failures are a side effect of a change I made to (initialize ...) so that adding a method to no-applicable-method wouldn't crash; the warning arises from the generic function having one method instead of none after define-generic is called. There are details on bug-guile here:
http://li
Hi,
(Assuming we're talking about MacOS X on Intel-based macs. Maybe
`i386-apple-darwin*' is the correct GNU triple?)
"Pat Lasswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> make check produces 6 failures. I haven't tried 1.4, but 1.8 doesn't even
> build.
> FAIL: goops.test: defining generics: define-g
make check produces 6 failures. I haven't tried 1.4, but 1.8 doesn't even build.FAIL: goops.test: defining generics: define-generic: creating a new top-level bindingFAIL: goops.test: defining generics: define-generic: overwriting a top-level binding to a generic
FAIL: goops.test: defining accessor
Hi,
"Pat Lasswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In guile 1.6.8 on an intel mac, I've encountered reliable heap corruption with
> steps like the following
Before investigating any further, does Guile 1.6.8 "works" on Intel
Macs? Is it under MacOS X? For instance, did you successfully run the
t
