Yes! works.
--
Marco Maggi
"They say jump!, you say how high?"
Rage Against the Machine - "Bullet in the Head"
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
"Neil Jerram" wrote:
>"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Example: I have two predicates HIT-NAN? and MAP-NAN?
>> which one it is better to call NAN?
>
>I'm afraid I don't understand. Perhaps you could write
>the down for the two possibilities that you have in mind.
For a vector of rea
Ciao,
I wanted to create an accessor called ELM with synopsis:
(set! (elm obj key) value)
(elm obj key)
which is the same required by the VECTOR-SET! and
VECTOR-REF pair. For this both the #:accessor
keyword of class definition and the explicit
definition:
(define-method (elm (obj ) k
On 18 Aug, 2006, at 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Browsing Wikipedia for acosh formulas it seems to me
that GSL is using an equivalent of:
(log (- x (sqrt (- (* x x) 1
while the others are using an equivalent of:
(log (+ x (sqrt (- (* x x) 1
I'm interested in having equal r
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciao,
>
> on the GNU Scientific Library mailing list I asked the
> following:
>
>>for some values of the operand I get different
>>results from 'acosh' when using GSL (1.8), Guile (1.8)
>>and GNU Octave (2.1.63). Other functions give me
>>differ
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciao,
>
> when I define a generic function that accepts a procedure
> or generic function as parameter I have to define two
> identical functions:
>
> (define-method (map (p ) ...
> (define-method (map (p ) ...
>
> is there a base class for and ?
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciao,
>
> I have two predicate functions that act upon a vector
> or matrix: the hit predicate produces a single #t/#f
> result while the map predicate produces a vector or rank
> 2 array of #t/#f values.
>
> Using generic functions I can write funct
