Re: testing arity

Thanks, Neil. Sounds like an excellent answer! Regards, Jon Neil Jerram wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:19:28AM -0500, Jon Wilson wrote: Hi, Is there a good way to determine the number of arguments that a given procedure will take? Here's a fishing rod ;-) |

Re: testing arity

Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And if you're not keen on parsing arity's output, see its definition > in (ice-9 session) for the procedure properties that it queries to > produce this. (procedure-property obj 'arity) being the operative part, it gives a list of "(required-count option

Re: gh_ to scm_ manual bug

Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > scm_c_primitive_load ... scm_c_eval_string Thanks, I added them. ___ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

Re: testing arity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:19:28AM -0500, Jon Wilson wrote: >> Hi, >> Is there a good way to determine the number of arguments that a given >> procedure will take? > > Here's a fishing rod ;-) > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ guile > | guile> (apropos "arity") > | (ice-9