Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> | From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> | Specifically, 'eqv?' would be changed to return '#t' when comparing
>> | negative and positive zero:
>> |
>> | (eqv? 0.0 -0.0) => #t
>
> I missed the explanation for why this might be desirable.
P
dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Doc snarfing of C code is done in several stages.
>>
>> [...]
FWIW, this area is on my medium-term mental roadmap, because in my
view online help is more useful when you have a more efficient
in
> | From: Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | Specifically, 'eqv?' would be changed to return '#t' when comparing
> | negative and positive zero:
> |
> | (eqv? 0.0 -0.0) => #t
I missed the explanation for why this might be desirable.
I don't think it is the Right Thing. Arguments from
