Re: modify environments to make sandboxes

2006-06-22 Thread Alan Grover
Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >> >>>Code confinement is indeed an interesting feature. Fortunately, Guile >>>offers various ways to do it (AFAIK, there's no standard way to do this >>>in R5RS Scheme)

Re: timezone offsets

2006-06-22 Thread Aaron VanDevender
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:57 -0500, Aaron VanDevender wrote: > I notice that if I run: > > $ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time' > Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500 On second thought, I think this patch is better since in keeps the scheme and C representations of the

timezone offsets

2006-06-22 Thread Aaron VanDevender
I notice that if I run: $ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time' Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500 But I live at -0500 (CDT), not +500. The following patch fixes it: Index: stime.c === RCS file: /sources/

Re: modify environments to make sandboxes

2006-06-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Code confinement is indeed an interesting feature. Fortunately, Guile >> offers various ways to do it (AFAIK, there's no standard way to do this >> in R5RS Scheme). :-) [...] > > That's a very nice ex