Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>
>>>Code confinement is indeed an interesting feature. Fortunately, Guile
>>>offers various ways to do it (AFAIK, there's no standard way to do this
>>>in R5RS Scheme)
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:57 -0500, Aaron VanDevender wrote:
> I notice that if I run:
>
> $ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time'
> Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500
On second thought, I think this patch is better since in keeps the
scheme and C representations of the
I notice that if I run:
$ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time'
Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500
But I live at -0500 (CDT), not +500. The following patch fixes it:
Index: stime.c
===
RCS file: /sources/
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Code confinement is indeed an interesting feature. Fortunately, Guile
>> offers various ways to do it (AFAIK, there's no standard way to do this
>> in R5RS Scheme). :-) [...]
>
> That's a very nice ex