Re: [goops] adding a number class with generic methods

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > I do not understand why the first solution does not work; >I've tried different combinations of functions but there is >something I am missing. Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the generic methods. -- Marco Maggi _

Re: potential memory leak in do loop

Stephane Chatigny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (although I have not tracked the memory usage yet). You'll probably have to use one of the various malloc debugging packages to find who has allocated the memory that's never freed, to see who's supposed to be responsible for that. __

Re: passing flags to a function

Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SCM scm_myfn(SCM flags) > { > myfn (scm_num2int (flags, SCM_ARG1, "myfn")); Various things in the guile core are done like that, stuff like O_RDWR for `open'. The list of symbols Ludovic described is done in the guile-gtk interface and works nicely t

potential memory leak in do loop

Hello,   I use the MIT MPB package on a machine running guile 1.6 and Debian-Linux 3.1r0a. Apparently, I generate a memory link while executing a do loop (although I have not tracked the memory usage yet). When I run the loop, the process is aborted before the end of the iteration. Inter

[goops] adding a number class with generic methods

Hi, I am trying to add a new number class, export generic methods from a module and import them into another one. If I ignore the GOOPS tutorial and read only the reference, it is my understanting that I should do: ;; ;; exporting.scm (define-modul

Re: passing flags to a function

Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi, Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks for the reply. Could you show a short example of what the scheme function call might look like? Are you meaning (foo (list 'flag1 'flag2 'someotherflag)) Rather, it would look like: (foo 'flag1 'flag2 'someothe

Re: passing flags to a function

Hi, Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the reply. Could you show a short example of what the > scheme function call might look like? > > Are you meaning > > (foo (list 'flag1 'flag2 'someotherflag)) Rather, it would look like: (foo 'flag1 'flag2 'someotherflag) This is bec

Re: passing flags to a function

Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hi, Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I can do something like SCM scm_myfn(SCM flags) { myfn (scm_num2int (flags, SCM_ARG1, "myfn")); return SCM_BOOLEAN_T; } but I'm not sure of the best way to define the flags in scheme. Or maybe this is not "the scheme

Re: passing flags to a function

On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:25 -0400, Dan McMahill wrote: > Hello, > > I'm sure this is a very basic question about passing "or-able" flags to > a function. In C I might do something like: ...snip... You can make the flags available to scheme as numbers, and then the Scheme users can use Guile's b

Re: passing flags to a function

Hi, Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can do something like > > SCM scm_myfn(SCM flags) > { > > myfn (scm_num2int (flags, SCM_ARG1, "myfn")); > > return SCM_BOOLEAN_T; > > } > > but I'm not sure of the best way to define the flags in scheme. Or > maybe this is not "the scheme way"

passing flags to a function

Hello, I'm sure this is a very basic question about passing "or-able" flags to a function. In C I might do something like: #define FLAG_FOO 1 #define FLAG_BAR 2 #define FLAG_BAZ 4 myfn(int flags) { if (flags & FLAG_BAR) printf ("bar flag is set\n"); ... } and then call myfn