Re: Modified load-path proposal

2006-01-12 Thread Neil Jerram
steve tell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just a little note to say that I've been following along and am glad > this is being discussed - and of course a few comments. Thanks for both! >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> Because people haven't been doing so for years. Some of

Re: Another load path idea

2006-01-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The basic idea behind all of the previous proposals was to create some > kind of config when a package was installed, such that other Guile > code would be able to find that package automatically. But what if we > do things the other way round? When