Jon Wilson writes:
>
> (scheme->LaTeX (+ 7 (/ 18 5)))
> =>
> "7 + \frac{18}{5}"
shouldn't the argument be quoted? otherwise it will be evaluated
straight to 10.6 (or whatever style of representation has been
chosen for rationals, the unstable versions for guile seem to
provide for more pos
Hi David,
If this LaTeX + guile stuff goes well, might you consider releasing it
separately from guile-gnome? I think it could be very useful in its
own right.
Is it intended to parse LaTeX, or to create LaTeX? If create, from
what? If parse, for what purpose?
Sorry for all the questions. I'v
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have any, but note that we need to have
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 slib))
>
> make adequate symbols visible in the using module. Given that
> guile.init has code to use define-public most of the time, putting the
> load insidde the module definition
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ ./pre-inst-guile
> guile> (load-from-path "slib/guile.init")
> guile> (require 'new-catalog)
> guile> (require 'fft)
> guile> fft
> #
> guile>
>
> At least from this admittedly trivial test, ignoring ice-9/slib.scm
> and using the slib g
David Pirotte writes:
> but that is not possible, because the string (here simulated)
> is a user typed in string (through a gtk interface
> programmed in guile-gnome) upon which I have no control.
> I precisly wish to parse it to create a .tex file later
> processed by latex ...
If you expe
Em Ter, 2005-11-08 às 15:52 +0100, David Pirotte escreveu:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:49:01 -0200
> "Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Em Seg, 2005-11-07 às 14:53 +0100, David Pirotte escreveu:
> > > does anyone understands why this does not return the expected result
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:34:16 -0600
Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
> This is interesting... Just for the sake of my curiousity, could you
> describe what project this is for?
Hi John,
I'm writing a little peace of software in guile-gnome, which interface
with postgres for the
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:49:01 -0200
"Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Seg, 2005-11-07 às 14:53 +0100, David Pirotte escreveu:
> > does anyone understands why this does not return the expected result
> >
> > (define *texu/reserved-characters*
> > ;; % \ { }
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:22:31 +
> both interpretations are fine.
Yes, but which one did you mean? It seems to me that they have
opposite implications.
i didn't have any one specific idea in mind. that there are conflicting
implications
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the code snippet from ice-9/slib.scm, with use of load that
> respects the prefix (NetBSD/pkgsrc puts things in /usr/pkg, not /usr).
>
> (define-module (ice-9 slib)
> :export (slib:load
> implementation-vicinity
> library-vicinit
10 matches
Mail list logo
