Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> In practice I would guess not. Most distribution-managed packages
> would go into /usr/share/guile, and most home-built packages into
> /usr/local/share/guile, I'd guess. What is your concern, though?
Mainly that I think you can get what you want from
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (define-module (ice-9 slib)
> :export (slib:load
> implementation-vicinity
> library-vicinity
> home-vicinity
> scheme-implementation-type
> scheme-implementation-version
I would worry very much that these a
I got it to work, and it is non-global. As I see it, the ice-9 slib
module has a bunch of definitions, and programs that want to use them,
including require, have to use-module it. This is how it always
worked. I ended up doing it the same way, except using guile.init
instead of the homegrown co
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +
>
>Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that
>someone will change the design so that the interface does the
>enforcement itself; or t
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What advantage is this over putting a symlink in /usr/share/guile/site
> to point to this alternate location?
Nothing really compelling, perhaps, but...
- some OSs don't have symlinks (i.e. Windows)
- the symlink approach doesn't work if a package instal
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:48:43AM +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > In the init.d approach [...]
> What advantage is this over putting a symlink in /usr/share/guile/site
> to point to this alternate location?
Something similar to what the /etc/init.d thin
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:37:33PM -0500, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
>From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:04:58 +
>
>We could enforce this by [...]
>I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts (again).
>
> if your design requires enforcement, [...]
Neil con
From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +
Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that
someone will change the design so that the interface does the
enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it
allows,
