Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting. As I am totally ignorant about how any of the package
> managers work internally, I just supposed it would be OK to use something
> that used shell scripts as you're supposed to be able to read bash with
> enough effort and a tutorial next
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> What is the `copy' reader option about? Looking at the code, it seems
> that this has to do with source properties but I fail to understand the
> point of this option.
It tells Guile to take a copy of the source expression as originally
re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> There were really two points in my message:
>
> 1. Autoconf/Automake (and, consequently, the user) _must_ know about
> these three different directories, namely `guileschemedir',
> `guilelibdir' and `guileobjectdir', instead of only one direct
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That all sounds fine, except that I think (policy!) we should either
> discourage putting stuff under 1.6, or suggest 1.6/site, so that
> guile's own files and other stuff are cleanly separated. I agree that
> mechanism sufficient for various policies is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Then you're just waiting for the nod from Marius. :)
>
> Oh, but it looks like he's been away for a couple of months or so.
> Anyway, we'll see.
I'm back! :-)
Yeah, I had accidentally disconnected myself fr
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 18:32 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
> > ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path
>
> Sounds like a %load-path problem. What do you get on your system for
>
> $ which g
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 18:32 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
> > ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path
>
> Sounds like a %load-path problem. What do you get on your system for
>
> $ which g
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The two developers who have thought most on this subject in the past
> are Marius (Vollmer) and Rob (Browning), and they've both been out of
> circulation for the last week or so. No doubt one of them will
> respond when they catch up with the list.
I ju
