Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I did resolve the problem, not through understanding, but through
> brute force and the use of apt. I uninstalled guile and reinstalled it.
> Updateing lilypond using the autopackager must have corrupted the previous
> installation of guile. Th
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:32:24 +0400, Vorfeed Canal wrote:
> On 10/18/05, Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Updateing lilypond using the autopackager must have corrupted the previous
>> installation of guile. This solved the problem, but of course I don't know
>> how or why :)
>
> Noo
On 18 Oct 2005 12:16:05 -0400, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That all sounds fine, except that I think (policy!) we should either
> discourage putting stuff under 1.6, or suggest 1.6/site, so that
> guile's own files and other stuff are cleanly separated. I agree that
> mechanism suffic
That all sounds fine, except that I think (policy!) we should either
discourage putting stuff under 1.6, or suggest 1.6/site, so that
guile's own files and other stuff are cleanly separated. I agree that
mechanism sufficient for various policies is the key point, but think
we also need to suggest
On 10/18/05, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perhaps dynamic-link should look in guilelibdir _only_ if an absolute
> > path is not given, or a primitive that does this. One important
> > feature is that inclusion, dynamic link, etc
On 10/18/05, Shelagh Manton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Updateing lilypond using the autopackager must have corrupted the previous
> installation of guile. This solved the problem, but of course I don't know
> how or why :)
Noone knows this with autopackage. This ugly thing was developed as
"Ins
Hello,
What is the `copy' reader option about? Looking at the code, it seems
that this has to do with source properties but I fail to understand the
point of this option.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
Hi,
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps dynamic-link should look in guilelibdir _only_ if an absolute
> path is not given, or a primitive that does this. One important
> feature is that inclusion, dynamic link, etc. should be able to ensure
> it gets exactly what was searched for a
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In principle yes, the current mechanism we're discussing for load-path
> could be extended to `guilelibdir' and `guileobjectdir'. But
> personally I don't want to go anywhere near there just yet - it's hard
> enough trying to tie down all the details
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then you're just waiting for the nod from Marius. :)
Oh, but it looks like he's been away for a couple of months or so.
Anyway, we'll see.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http:/
10 matches
Mail list logo