Re: Exposing common type wrapping/unwrapping methods

2005-09-21 Thread Kevin Ryde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > Again, I only tested AF_INET addresses and I didn't try `sendto' and > `bind'. Untested code cannot be accepted. AF_UNIX is easy, AF_INET6 might depend on the system. You'll need to make something for test-suite/tests/socket.test exercising each ca

Re: Exposing common type wrapping/unwrapping methods

2005-09-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Right. I followed your suggestion (with slight modifications, namely > have an ADDRESS_SIZE output parameter for functions that return a > pointer to `struct sockaddr') and updated my patch. However, the only > thing I tested is `scm_from_sockad