Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> We we already warn when importing something that shadows a core
> definition, so we could as well warn when redefining one.
I thought about that for my lint program and decided it'd be too
annoying to report local bindings that shadow, but I did set u
NEW.FIRST TIME OFFERED IN THE INDUSTRY.
NEVER BEFORE AVAILABLE. INTRODUCTORY OFFER.
The 2006 American Hospital Email Directory. 174,000
Email Addresses for hospital executives. ($247.00).
In response to numerous requests for email addresses
for hospital executives, the New 2006 American Hospital
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> How about the following (patch against 1.7.2)?
Nice, I applied it, thanks!
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://list
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also (and don't try this at home kids):
>> (define 'x (* x x))
>> '2
>> => 4
>
> And presumably (or in my view) this is all fine, except for the last
> example, where Guile should signal an error or at least give a
> warning. Right?
Hmm. There are
--
CALL FOR PAPERS
ACM SIGPLAN 2005 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming
http://www.deinprogramm.de/scheme-2005/
Tallinn, Estonia
$B'$'$'$!!Bg?M$I$&$7$N=P2q$$$r3Z$7$_$^$;$s$+!)!!'$'$'$(B
$B!!%*!<%W%sFCJL4k2hCf$K$D$-(B
$B!!(BNINTENDO DS,PSP,iPad$B$,9g7W#1#0#0L>MM$KEv$?$kBg%A%c%s%9!*(B
$B(B $B!!"->\$7$/$O%3%A%i"-(B
$B!!(B http://live.livedear.com/?num=100
$B!!$5$i$K!*(B
$B!!4|4VCf$K?75,EPO?$5$l
