Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]:
> >> We should fix test-num-integral so that it still builds in that case,
> >> of course. Do you also need scm_init_guile for your own programs?
> >
> > no, I was just trying to upgrade the OpenBSD port for guile to version
> > 1.8.0, and it would be cool if th
Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:10:39]:
> steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]:
> >>
> >> Thanks. What is the Guile version of the existing OpenBSD port?
> >
> > it's 1.6.7.
>
> Thanks.
>
Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:41:16]:
> steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:10:39]:
> >>
> >> Digging a bit further, this looks like it's caused by
> >> HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK not being defined. Can
Neil Jerram [2006-03-11, 18:43:17]:
> steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:41:16]:
> >>
> >> OK, so it's HAVE_LIBC_STACK_END that is not defined, then? When this
> >> is the case, 1.8 leaves scm_init_gu
Marius Vollmer [2006-03-26, 02:01:16]:
> Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I will include the test program into configure.in and only use
> > __libc_stack_end (or gc_os_dep) when it is really needed.
>
> Done. Steven, please test: either from the "branch_release_1-8"
> branch in C
