inary which is smaller and faster to generate and
parse.
guile-cbor provides a Guile implementation of CBOR.
Happy hacking!
pukkamustard
Mike Gran writes:
Hello All-
In celebration of the (slightly belated) 10-year anniversary of
Guile
v2.0, we're having another Guile Potluck! The Gui
ectly with Guile and I'd offer my help in upstreaming ports to Guile.
I've previously used pfds (as mentioned by Maxime), but I've encountered
some nasty issues that are keeping me from using it again
(https://github.com/ijp/pfds/issues/5).
-pukkamustard
Jessica Tallon writes
the common case of a hash with literal keys would be nice.
> For example, #hq((foo 1) (bar 2)) for a hash with keys compared with
> eq? Scheme is kind of odd for not having hash literal syntax.
No strong opinions on a read syntax. But I welcome anything that might
increase adoption of purely functional data structures. I think they're
cool! :)
- pukkamustard
Linus Björnstam writes:
> On Sat, 4 Mar 2023, at 17:38, pukkamustard wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Makes me wonder, are Andy Wingo's fash/fector purely functional? Why do
>> they need atomic boxes? Aren't they only necessary for destructive
>> updat
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> pukkamustard skribis:
>
>> I've been using SRFI-146
>> (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-146/srfi-146.html) for functional
>> mappings. There's a Guile port:
>> https://inqlab.net/git/guile-srfi-146.git/ (also
