version numbers don’t
> proliferate quickly, so the code uses a brute force approach for
> now.
>
>
> Derek
>
> --
> Derek Upham
> derek_up...@mailfence.com
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
e whether I
> can still reproduce it. Given the amount of redirects that media
> website backends do, it’s possible that I’ll never come across the
> problem again.
>
> Derek
>
> Tristan Colgate writes:
>
> > http/2 is a substantially different protocol, it will take
>
then
I'm calling out to C, have an extra function call and all that
entails.
Providing a bunch of hard coded SIMD based vector ops might well be
good enough, but I thought a more general solution might be sexier.
I've no idea how such a thing might look though.
--
Tristan Colgate
, but due to privacy policy,
>> I can't say much about it.
>>
>
> Actually, there's no privacy policy, that's why GNU and GPL exists.
> If something force you not to share, you may rewrite it all by
> yourself(or other guys), and GPL it. Then no more privacy po
Hi All,
I thought I'd see how things are looking on master (great to see work is
still progressing toward 2.2). I just wanted to check that the compile
times I've been seeing are to be expected. My (pretty weedy) laptop took
over a day to build one it hit building the scms. guile-snmp took a good
re putting in,
Cheers
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
then turning off
compilation?). Everything
works well (after some minor changes to swig), it just looks a bit untidy.
Cheers,
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
generated (snmp net-snmp)
2009/12/18 Ludovic Courtès :
> Hi,
>
> Tristan Colgate writes:
>
>> I'm using guile and swig for some library binding and get
>> compilation errors/warning
>> that seem to be due to the compiler not knowing that a load-extension
>>
ave confirmed via strace
previously whilst debugging other issues).
As mentioned before, this is purely cosmetic in that the code does
actually get run and work, it is the
compilation that fails (thhough things carry on anyway)
2009/12/18 Ludovic Courtès :
> Hi,
>
> Tristan Colgat
s for macros? It doesn't
seem unreasonable, but doing something like (help macroname) seems to
break anyway (for relatively obvious
reasons).
Thanks very much for all the hard work you guys are putting in,
Cheers
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins f
d...
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?28440
Cheers,
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
it to the following
bug report
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?28442
Could it be the return value of the init function? is that supposed to
return anything particular?
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
. swig does still need some changes but
I haven't got a good enough understanding yet to go to the swig guys
(memory allocation is the main issue, and they use some deprecated
functions.
Cheers, and thanks for all the great work on guile.
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can g
Hi all,
I mentioned this on IRC but thought I'd pop a message in here to incase.
git master is return for (class-of #u32(1 2 3 4)) rather than
the previous . Apparently this is related to
"reimplement srfi-4 vectors on top of bytevectors"
Cheers,
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarl
This updates the #:procedure method to use slot-set! instead of
set-object-procedure!.
---
module/oop/goops.scm |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/module/oop/goops.scm b/module/oop/goops.scm
index d0d65fa..9ebfab8 100644
--- a/module/oop/goops.scm
+++ b/mo
overridable (at least
not via a let). Could they be made into
fluids? or is the current "this is definitely guile", approach to be
enforced? Iknow I could just re-implement
start-repl and co, but that doesn't really seem in the spirit of things.
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
&qu
> The most important discoveries will provide answers to questions that we do
> not yet know how to ask and will concern objects we have not yet imagined.
> -John N. Bahcall, astrophysicist (1935-2005)
>
>
>
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
Probably not the ideal fix, I tried using AC_CHECK_TYPE and adding
netinet/in.h but it didn't work. I've just copied the approach used
for LINGER
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
Add a couple more socket options useful for multicast.
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
libguile/socket.c | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
cing the void returns with an int gives the correct behaviour.
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
printer: # parser: #f compilers:
((tree-il . #)) decompilers:
((tree-il . #)) evaluator:
#
joiner: #f make-default-environment: #>
Some code along these lines has been working OK on 2.0+ for a while,
not quite sure when it broke.
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily
lds. The caller
>> now must perform their own checks on the response data size, making
>> your function effectively this:
>>
>> - read response body data from port.
>>
>> So what is the utility of calling a procedure to do that over, say,
>> reading from the port directly? [pointed out earlier in this thread]
>
>
--
Tristan Colgate-McFarlane
"You can get all your daily vitamins from 52 pints of guiness, and a
glass of milk"
Something that works through a http proxy (if HTTP is going to be sued),
would be nice too. Failing that, an easy way of creating and using local
mirrors and repos would be really useful.
That's my pet hate with racket.
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 15:56 +0800, CRLF0710 wrote:
> Something like the Plan
23 matches
Mail list logo