Daniel Llorens writes:
> The only generalized-vector-? function that doesn't have a direct
> array-? correspondence is generalized-vector-length. However, even for
> arrays of rank > 1 it is often convenient to have a function such as
>
> (array-length a) = (car (array-dimensions a))
>
> or maybe
This is going to sound like a daft question, but: is there any reason
that the thread that calls 'touch' needs to be the same thread that
calls its continuation?
I.e. why does there need to be a special "main thread"? Can't "picking
up a job blocking on touch" just be another task allocated to th
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter TB Brett skribis:
>
>> This is going to sound like a daft question, but: is there any reason
>> that the thread that calls 'touch' needs to be the same thread that
>> calls its continuation
Hi Andy,
All of this stuff sounds great, and I can't wait for it to be available!
Can I please request an addition to your to-do list: a document that
explains what changes to libguile-using programs will be required?
Getting people from 1.8 to 2.0 is hard enough, and soon Guile will be
*two* majo
Hi Mads,
Glad to see I'm not the only person who's building Guile for Windows!
For the gEDA project, which uses Guile quite extensively, we've for
quite some years had a recipe-based cross-build system called "minipack"
that's use for cross-compiling Guile and the geda-gaf electronic design
packa
David Kastrup writes:
>> * I still wouldn't be surprised if `local-eval' does the wrong thing if
>> (current-module) is different from what it was when the associated
>> `primitive-eval' was called.
>
> Before anyone even _defines_ what the "right thing" would be, there is
> little point in
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 23 Jan 2012 22:03, Mark H Weaver writes:
>> Your priorities are reversed from what they ought to be.
>>
>> What you _should_ be worried about is making commitments in our API that
>> we must continue to support forever. This is a _real_ problem, since it
>> constrain
Catonano writes:
> I copied a patch from my gmail web inerface and pasted in a local file, but I
> discovered I had to run dos2unix on it in order to git to process it properly
> (see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1821267/
> how-can-i-apply-a-patch-file-in-git) and then I also run into anoth
Andy Wingo writes:
> I use git, from the command line and from Emacs. When I use it from
> Emacs, I use magit: http://philjackson.github.com/magit/
>
> I mostly use magit to commit, and otherwise the command line to update,
> rebase, etc. I use gitk sometimes to get a graphical representations
