Hello Guile Hackers,
I've rebased the wip-elisp branch on top of commit
449f50dd84a081aea16ef678e32bf37abe429ff6 (git describe: v3.0.4-64-g33232cb5c4).
It's published here:
https://git.sr.ht/~g20r/guile
There are two additional failed tests which appear to be new tests added since
the last w
Hello Guile Hackers,
I've rebased the wip-elisp branch on top of commit
449f50dd84a081aea16ef678e32bf37abe429ff6 (git describe: v3.0.4-64-g33232cb5c4).
It's published here:
https://git.sr.ht/~g20r/guile
There are two additional failed tests which appear to be new tests added since
the last w
Hello Guile Hackers,
I've rebased the wip-elisp branch on top of commit
449f50dd84a081aea16ef678e32bf37abe429ff6 (git describe: v3.0.4-64-g33232cb5c4).
It's published here:
https://git.sr.ht/~g20r/guile
There are two additional failed tests which appear to be new tests added since
the last w
Hi Ricardo,
Thanks, your changes fixed a couple of the test errors I saw.
On Monday, September 13, 2021 06:56 EDT, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
>
> Hi Gregg,
>
> > I've rebased the wip-elisp branch on top of commit
> > 449f50dd84a081aea16ef678e32bf37abe429ff6 (git describe:
> > v3.0.4-64-g33232cb5c4
builds in about 20 minutes on my machine.
If anyone has that running, it would be nice to have a comparison of the
build/run speed.
On Sunday, September 12, 2021 22:13 EDT, Christine Lemmer-Webber
wrote:
> "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed
ctions, speak now or forever hold these commits!
>
> Christine Lemmer-Webber writes:
>
> > This is awesome.
> >
> > So, what's stopping us from merging this into guile main now before it
> > bitrots again? :)
> >
> > "Gregg Sangster"
Hi Ricardo,
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 13:34 EDT, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
> I also had he same experience. Guile Emacs would segfault very
> quickly. That’s why I started a rebase on top of the nearest
> Emacs release, which is 25.2. I had to abandon the rebase,
> because after about 45 comm
Hi Christine,
On Friday, October 22, 2021 12:17 EDT, Christine Lemmer-Webber
wrote:
> Christine Lemmer-Webber writes:
> > I missed earlier in the thread that Gregg said that we should use
> > --disable-jit. Once I did that it was fine. So ignore this bit!
> >
> > - Christine
>
> It wasn't t
