Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm

Hey, sorry for being so inactive in the last days (weeks?), I'm just having some free time after my final exams here. Yeah, I would assign the copyright to the FSF, I already read this but thought I'll cope with that later^^ - Daniel On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Noa

Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports

Hey, I don't want to comment on what guile should choose to do in the future but just wanted to say which interface would be clear to me. In the first place I agree that ports should be seperated and not mixed textual/binary (mind, I know it may be that this can't be just changed that easily in g

Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports

Hey, I think if you only use them seperate there's a clearer distinction. If you have it mixed you can do some, say hacking, where you see it works but you can't see anywhere what you're exactly doing, most of it is hidden in the guile implementation, which interprets %default-port-conversion-stra

Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions

Hey, On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > Why not specify the logic in scheme and output it either to C or Assembler > :-) That sounds very cool, and would be very cool, I thought first, but then I realized that you wouldn't be able to bootstrap guile anymore :-/ -

Re: patching gcc to allow other calling conventions

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > On a second thought guile do have an initital interpreter that is either a > vm or a native no? > Perhaps one can make use of that somehow! Yeah, I thought about that too, but thought first that it would be impossible. But if you f

Re: simple syntax expression faiilure,

Hi, I think the problem is #,@ is used to merge a list into the expression (just like ,@) and #'a is only the syntax object of the symbol a instead of a list. If you say #`(#,#'a #,@#'(a)) it works. Daniel On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > Is this a bug? > > sch

Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm

Hi, I've done some work on (ice-9 occam-channel) and fixed the module exports, the alt macro and extended it a little bit. Here are the patches, but they are all just micro-commits, I hope that is okay. - Daniel 0001-fixed-exports-of-module-ice-9-occam-channel.scm.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm

you on this list has any way to check that these >>> are correct. (Or if they do, the people who know are not replying.) >>> >>> So I propose this: if no one replies to this email in two days, I will >>> merge the patches. >>> >>> And I hate