l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Beside, related to Chris’ comment, I’m a bit concerned about versioning
> in such a widely distributed repo. The package graph in Guix has zero
> degrees of liberty: every package is connected to other packages; every
> Guix user sees the exact same graph.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> To work around that, I think the server should resolve package
>>> specifications when the potluck.scm file is submitted, and insert each
>>> package in the Guix package graph of the moment. Does that make sense?
>>> Maybe that’s what you were describing
Hi,
I was reading about the "system" and "system*" procedures in the Guile
manual, and it seems like the actual behavior of Guile seems to
contradict what the manual says. I'm using Guile version 2.2.4.
The Guile manual says that these procedures return the exit status as
returned by waitpid:
use of status:exit-val,
but how does the attached patch look to you? It's a small change, but I
think this would have been enough to dispel my confusion.
--
Chris
From 4acd5ec212415efff6b9f847d1a7b9c6c9e7a526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Marusich
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 00:47:23 -
r status value" [...].
I agree. I've attached a new patch that makes the change. It also adds
a cross-reference that I think is helpful. How does it look?
--
Chris
From 720a2069286e983b63b2d66b4471bc4e30a8d2cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Marusich
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 00
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Looks good to me. I pushed it to the stable-2.2 branch.
Great, thank you very much!
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ludo, Pjotr, and others,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Pjotr Prins skribis:
>
>> If you intend to come and/or want to speak please add your name and
>> proposed title to the new page at
>>
>> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/FOSDEM2018
>>
>> Alternatively, reply
