[PATCH] doc: Use archived URL from Internet Archive for syntax-rules primer.

* doc/ref/api-macros.texi (Syntax Rules): Use archived URL from Internet Archive for syntax-rules primer. --- doc/ref/api-macros.texi | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/ref/api-macros.texi b/doc/ref/api-macros.texi index a353719cb..ecd54de8e 100644

[PATCH] Revert "Mention package GNU Autopoint in README."

GNU Autopoint is a part of GNU gettext. This reverts commit 3badbb71c6d29ea94e500309b8d6b80e61d0c460. --- README | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 6c81f14f0..7c498d6fa 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ When building from a Git checkout, th

Replacing Guile test-suite with SRFI-64?

Hi, Would a rewrite of the Guile tests using SRFI-64 be a welcome idea? IMO the advantages of doing so are: * Less “specifics” that need to be learned solely for working with Guile. It's easier for people already using SRFI-64 to “bring in” their experience. * Standardized/portable. Straightforw

Re: Replacing Guile test-suite with SRFI-64?

Hi Mike, On 2023-09-23 16:13, Mike Gran wrote: > And personally, I find that errors in srfi-64 tests are more difficult to > interpret > that errors in the guile test suite framework. The logging is worse. If I'm not mistaken the logging behavior can be customized by writing your own SRFI-64 tes