Hi,
Rob Browning writes:
[...]
> I went ahead and moved SRFI-197 to the newer commit so we have the new
> SPDX headers, but I also kept the license text in each file for now
> under the assumption that I should stick to the current convention
> until/unless Guile itself adopts SPDX.
I think th
Hi Rob,
Rob Browning writes:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> So for now I've attempted to just allow us to mix and match SRFI-64 and
>> (test-suite lib) based tests by integrating SRFI-64 into the existing
>> automake/check-guile arrangement via a suitable test driver.
>
> I've pushed this prelimin
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> I would assume the reason here is Automake.
Exactly, we need some way to know which test harness we're using for
each file, (test-suite lib) or (srfi srfi-64), and with the current
arrangement, that ends up in in ./check.guile.in where we decide whether
to run
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> Rob Browning writes:
>>
>>> So for now I've attempted to just allow us to mix and match SRFI-64 and
>>> (test-suite lib) based tests by integrating SRFI-64 into the existing
>>> automake/check-guile arrangement via a suitable test
