Jonas et al-
OK. Probably against my better judgement, haha, I'm going to try to help.
First off, these patches look good to me. They are necessary if we want to
try to support Windows. Plus Jonas figured out a couple of the errors I never
managed
to work out with Lightning and the VM. So I'm ve
>> If we do care about building with the native MinGW toolchain,
>> in my humble opinion, there isn't much value in supporting then many
>> versions of MinGW other than UCRT64.
> Is there any doco on how to do that?
Well these days, as far as I can tell, the MinGW that lives on Sourceforge
seems
> On 26 Feb 2025, at 9:37 am, Mike wrote:
> Jonas et al-
>
> OK. Probably against my better judgement, haha, I'm going to try to help.
>
> First off, these patches look good to me. They are necessary if we want to
> try to support Windows. Plus Jonas figured out a couple of the errors I never
