Hi Janneke,
That was elegant. :-)
Nope---haven't seen it. (Or, at least I do not remember it.)
Maybe I should have a look at what the optimizer can do about Mark's code.
(As you might have seen, my code is a modification of the method syntax
implementation itself.)
Any opinions on what is best:
Since there are no comments, I'm inclined to apply this patch. I will do
that on Sunday if there are no comments before that.
Maybe I should first give a motivating example: guile-mqtt consists of a
thin wrapper over NYACC-generated code. There, I use a coding pattern that
I tend to use in cases w
Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
Hi Mikael,
> Since there are no comments, I'm inclined to apply this patch. I will do
> that on Sunday if there are no comments before that.
Just FYI, have you seen the attached patch by Mark Weaver? I've been
carrying that for some time now, functionality like this is
(I will of course add proper documentation in the manual, etc.)
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mikael Djurfeldt
wrote:
> Since there are no comments, I'm inclined to apply this patch. I will do
> that on Sunday if there are no comments before that.
>
> Maybe I should first give a motivating exa
