>+@code{xml->sxml}. A namespace can be removed by using a @code{#f} custom
>+prefix.
>
> @example
> (xml->sxml "http://example.org/ns1\";>text")
If you remove a single namespace, apparently that’s true, but what if multiple
namespaces are removed? Does it still work then?
(I can imagine that s
Am Mo., 22. Juli 2024 um 20:47 Uhr schrieb Maxime Devos <
maximede...@telenet.be>:
> > [...]
>
> >
>
> >In what kind of situation might a library name be made up of identifiers
> (syntax objects) that might need to carry lexical information?
>
>
>
> As implied by the previous: never (in Guile, and
Maxime Devos writes:
>> (xml->sxml "http://example.org/ns1\";>text")
> If you remove a single namespace, apparently that’s true, but what if
> multiple namespaces are removed? Does it still work then?
Yes, it still works:
(import (sxml simple))
(define xml-string "http://foobar\";>http://www.w
There are other costs involved, e.g., when mappings from library names
to the pathnames have to be specified. While it is straightforward to
encode a number of characters like "/" or ":", it is not so
straightforward to encode numbers differently from symbols that look
like numbers.
Why would
Am Di., 23. Juli 2024 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela :
> > There are other costs involved, e.g., when mappings from library names
> > to the pathnames have to be specified. While it is straightforward to
> > encode a number of characters like "/" or ":", it is not so
> > straightforward to enc
In R7RS, (srfi 1) and (srfi |1|) are different library names.
What is the practical harm?
(If there is some obscure point whereby the semantics don't add up in an
intuitive way, I would genuinely like to hear about it. In practice, I
think library aliases will be a must-have feature eventuall
I haven’t received the e-mail you are responding too (in particular, I don’t
know who you are responding to), but …
>> In R7RS, (srfi 1) and (srfi |1|) are different library names.
>
>What is the practical harm?
>
>(If there is some obscure point whereby the semantics don't add up in an
intuitiv
I haven’t received the e-mail you are responding too (in particular, I
don’t know who you are responding to), but …
I was talking to Marc; it seems there is a delay in list traffic.
As already has been answered:
The practical harm is (srfi |1|) is non-standard, but it looks standard
because
> If (srfi |1|) were to be standardised via SRFI process or RnRS (maybe
> implicitly as a ‘module names equality is to be done modulo
> number/symbol conversions’ thing in a future R8RS), then (srfi |1|)
> would be fine, but such a thing.
Looks like I didn’t finish the sentence: ‘but such a thi
Hi, I didn't see a help-guile list, I hope this isn't out of place
I'm trying to lexically bind a macro to a lexically bound transformer procedure
(let ((outer (lambda (x) #''(
(let-syntax ((inner outer))
inner))
This is producing an error
"reference to identifier outside its scope in
10 matches
Mail list logo
